Procedural reference — AW Chambers

    The Sri Lankan
    Legal System Guide

    An interactive guide to civil, criminal, and constitutional proceedings — from institution to final appeal, with case codes, bail eligibility, defence frameworks, and writ jurisdiction.

    Supreme CourtFinal appeal · FR jurisdiction
    Court of AppealAppellate · writ jurisdiction
    High CourtCriminal trials · provincial appeals
    Commercial HCCommercial matters > Rs. 20M
    District CourtCivil first instance
    Magistrate CourtCriminal first instance
    Human Rights CommissionFR complaints — preserves time
    !

    Procedural reference only — not legal advice

    What brings you here?

    Select the situation closest to yours and we will take you to the relevant part of the guide.

    Civil Litigation
    Money, land, commercial disputes & injunctions
    Criminal Proceedings
    Arrest, bail, trial, sentencing & appeal
    Fundamental Rights & Writs
    FR petitions, certiorari, mandamus & habeas corpus
    Sri Lankan Law — Overview
    Roman-Dutch roots, personal laws & sources
    Other Forums & Tribunals
    Labour, mediation, small claims & arbitration
    Limitation period calculator
    Work out a filing deadline and how much time is left.

    Indicative only. This adds the statutory period to the date you enter. It does not account for court vacations, rules on service, how the triggering day itself is counted, or any extension or condonation that may apply. Time limits can be decisive — confirm the exact date with an Attorney-at-Law before relying on it.

    01

    Institution of Action

    Filing the — commencement of proceedings

    A civil action is commenced by filing a plaint before the court of competent jurisdiction. Under s. 9 of the Civil Procedure Code, jurisdiction is determined by where the defendant resides, where the cause of action arose, where the contract was made, or where the land in dispute is situated.

    ?

    In plain terms: If someone owes you money, has damaged your property, or you have a dispute over land — you start a civil case by filing a document called a plaintThe founding document of a civil action. Sets out the parties, the facts, the legal basis for the claim, and the remedy sought. The equivalent of a claim form in other jurisdictions. in the correct court. The court you go to depends on where the dispute happened or where the other party lives — and how much money is at stake.

    District Court

    All civil disputes not specifically assigned elsewhere — money recovery, land, partition, divorce, probate, company matters. Governed by the Judicature Act No. 2 of 1978, ss. 19–22.

    Commercial High Court

    Claims exceeding Rs. 20 million from commercial transactions: banking, export/import, insurance, debt, damage, companies, and intellectual property (HC Special Provisions Act No. 10 of 1996, 1st Schedule).
    Case type codes — District Court
    MR / DMR
    Money Recovery
    DR / DDR
    Debt Recovery
    L / DLM
    Land
    SPL / X
    Special
    P / DPA
    Partition
    D / DDV
    Divorce
    MS
    Money Summary
    ARB
    Arbitration
    IP
    Intellectual Property
    CO
    Company
    TAX
    Tax
    HP / DHP
    Hire Purchase
    Documents at filing
    • Plaint — parties, cause of action, facts, and relief sought (CPC ss. 39–54)
    • — authority granted by client to Attorney-at-Law
    • Stamp duty on the plaint at the prescribed rate based on claim value
    • forms — Form No. 16 and precept Form No. 17 (1st Schedule CPC)
    • Supporting where required by applicable law
    • Check for arbitration clause in any contract — s. 5 Arbitration Act No. 11 of 1995 bars court jurisdiction if present
    !

    : identify the applicable limitation period before filing.

    CPC ss. 6, 9, 39–54, 76Judicature Act No. 2 of 1978HC Special Provisions Act No. 10 of 1996Prescription OrdinanceArbitration Act No. 11 of 1995, s. 5
    02

    & Service

    Bringing the defendant before the court

    Once the is registered and a case number assigned, the registry issues summons on the defendant to be served by the Fiscal. The outcome on the summons returnable date depends on whether service was effected and whether the defendant appears.

    A
    Summons dispatched
    Registry issues summons; Fiscal serves on defendant at the address stated in the plaint
    B1
    Served — defendant appears
    Defendant files and answer on the summons returnable date (CPC ss. 72–78)
    B2
    Served — defendant absent
    Court may proceed against the defendant
    B3
    Service not effected
    Plaintiff must take steps to re-serve; court fixes a new date
    CPC ss. 55–71CPC ss. 72–78
    03

    Answer &

    Close of pleadings

    The answer is the defendant's formal response, traversing or admitting each averment in the . Where a counterclaim arises, the plaintiff may file a replication (CPC s. 79), completing the close of pleadings.

    The answer

    Filed with proxy on the returnable date. Must specifically traverse each disputed averment. Failure to traverse may be taken as an admission.

    The replication

    Filed by the plaintiff only where the defendant raises new facts or a counterclaim (CPC s. 79). Completes the close of pleadings.
    !

    Jurisdiction objections must be raised by a separate and distinct plea in the answer, expressly traversing the jurisdiction averment (CPC s. 76). This must be taken at the earliest opportunity — see Jalaldeen v. Rajaratnam [1986] 2 Sri LR 201.

    CPC ss. 72–78CPC s. 79 (Replication)CPC s. 76 (Jurisdiction)
    04

    Pre-Trial Conference

    Issues, admissions, and preparation for trial

    Once pleadings close, the matter is fixed for a pre-trial conference to narrow the issues in dispute, identify agreed facts, and ensure readiness for trial. The conference is conducted before the judge.

    • Written issues filed 14 days before pre-trial with notice to opposing party (CPC s. 142A)
    • Written admissions filed alongside issues
    • List of witnesses filed 15 days before trial date (CPC s. 121)
    • List of documents to be tendered in evidence (CPC s. 175)
    • Interrogatories or discovery applications if needed (CPC Chapter XVI) — must be completed before trial
    CPC ss. 79A, 142A–142ICPC ss. 121, 175
    05

    Trial

    Evidence, examination, and submissions

    The plaintiff leads evidence first through examination-in-chief, followed by cross-examination. The defendant then leads evidence. Burden of proof generally rests on the party asserting facts (Evidence Ordinance, s. 101).

    1
    Plaintiff's case — examination-in-chief
    Plaintiff leads evidence; witnesses examined then cross-examined by defence
    2
    Defendant's case
    Defendant leads evidence in response; witnesses examined then cross-examined by plaintiff
    3
    Written submissions
    Judge may direct parties to file written submissions on fact and law at conclusion of trial
    !

    Default: If a party fails to appear or comply with court orders, the matter may be fixed for trial or dismissed (CPC ss. 84–88). Always ensure attendance and compliance.

    Evidence OrdinanceCPC ss. 84–88
    06

    Judgment &

    The court's determination

    The judge delivers judgment answering each issue with reasons. A decree follows, giving formal effect to the judgment. The decree is the operative court order upon which enforcement is based.

    Judgment

    Written reasons setting out findings of fact and law, and the court's determination of each issue. May be delivered on the day or reserved to a fixed date.

    Decree

    The formal operative order. Obtain a certified copy from the registry before commencing any enforcement proceedings. Essential for execution.
    07

    Execution of

    Enforcing the judgment

    Where the judgment debtor fails to satisfy the order voluntarily, enforcement proceedings must be commenced. The decree does not automatically produce payment or compliance.

    • Obtain certified copy of decree from the registry
    • Apply for writ of execution — seizure of property and assets (CPC Chapter XXII)
    • Examine judgment debtor in relation to assets where applicable
    • Consider garnishee proceedings — attachment of debts owed to the judgment debtor
    CPC Chapter XXII
    08

    Appeal

    Challenging a judgment or order

    A party aggrieved by a judgment or order may prefer an appeal. The applicable route depends on which court delivered the impugned decision. Time limits are strict and non-extendable.

    District Court → Civil Appellate HC

    Appeal lies under Article 154P of the Constitution and HC Special Provisions (Amendment) Act No. 54 of 2006, s. 5A.

    Commercial HC → Supreme Court

    Appeal lies directly to the Supreme Court — no intermediate appellate level for Commercial HC decisions.

    Civil Appellate HC → Supreme Court

    A further appeal lies from the Civil Appellate HC to the Supreme Court as the court of final appeal in civil matters.
    !

    Time limits are strict and run from the date of judgment or order. Failure to appeal within time may extinguish the right of appeal. Refer to CPC Chapter VIII for the applicable period.

    CPC Chapter VIIIHC Special Provisions (Amendment) Act No. 54 of 2006, s. 5AConstitution Art. 154P
    01

    Investigation & Arrest

    Police powers and fundamental rights of the suspect

    A criminal investigation commences following a first information report or complaint. The police may arrest with or without warrant depending on the nature of the offence. On arrest, the suspect has immediate and non-waivable constitutional rights.

    ?

    In plain terms: If you or someone you know has been arrested, the police must bring that person before a Magistrate within 24 hours. They do not have to make any statement. They are entitled to speak to a lawyer before answering any questions. These rights exist regardless of what the police say — they cannot be waived.

    Rights of the arrested person — Constitution & CCPA
    • Right to mount a defence — to challenge the prosecution at every stage (CCPA, s. 260)
    • Informed of the reason for arrest — in the language understood by the suspect (Constitution, Art. 13(1))
    • Brought before a Magistrate within 24 hours (CCPA, s. 37)
    • Right to be represented by an Attorney-at-Law (Constitution, Art. 13(3))
    • Right to remain silent — no obligation to make a police statement (CCPA, s. 111)
    • Freedom from torture, cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment (Constitution, Art. 11)
    • Presumption of innocence until proved guilty beyond reasonable doubt (Constitution, Art. 13(5))
    • Right against double jeopardy — cannot be tried twice for the same offence (CCPA, s. 314)
    • Right against unlawful searches and seizures (Constitution, Art. 13)
    • Language interpretation throughout proceedings (Constitution, Art. 24)

    Arrest with warrant

    Issued by a Magistrate; must be shown to the arrested person. Must specify the offence alleged. Governed by CCPA ss. 54–71.

    Arrest without warrant

    Permitted for offences only. Suspect must be produced before a Magistrate within 24 hours (CCPA, s. 37). Governed by CCPA ss. 23–53.
    !

    Detention limits: Maximum 15 days total by Magistrate's order (CCPA, s. 115). A suspect against whom there is no allegation must be discharged without delay (CCPA, s. 120(3)). Police interrogation must comply with the IBJ Defender Manual guidelines — any statement obtained by duress or torture is inadmissible.

    Constitution Arts. 11, 13, 24CCPA ss. 23, 37, 54, 109, 111, 115, 120Bail Act No. 30 of 1997
    02

    First Production & Bail

    Appearance before the Magistrate — bail eligibility checker

    On first production the attorney may address the Magistrate on the accused's position, raise issues concerning the circumstances of arrest, and make a bail application. The bail regime depends entirely on the nature of the offence.

    Interactive bail eligibility — select the offence type

    What is the nature of the alleged offence?

    Bail as of right — Bail Act applies

    The accused shall be released on bail (CCPA, s. 402). Application may be made orally to the Magistrate on first production. Bail Act No. 30 of 1997, s. 7 governs conditions: undertaking to appear; own recognizance; bond with surety; deposit of reasonable sum.

    Non-bailable — discretionary bail in Magistrate Court

    Bail is at the Magistrate's discretion. Submissions must squarely address the four factors under Bail Act s. 14: (1) risk of non-appearance; (2) risk of further offences; (3) risk of interference with witnesses or evidence; (4) public disquiet. If bail is refused at the Magistrate Court, may be sought in the High Court.

    High Court bail only — Bail Act s. 13

    Only the High Court can grant bail where the offence is punishable by death or life imprisonment (Bail Act, s. 13). Application by petition and directly to the High Court, supported by the Magistrate Court case record. Maximum period of incarceration without trial: one year, extendable to two years on the Attorney General's application (Bail Act, s. 17).

    Special statutory bail provision — Bail Act does not apply

    The Bail Act does not apply to offences under the Prevention of Terrorism Act, Public Security Ordinance, or statutes with express bail provisions (e.g. PODA s. 83(1)). The relevant statute exclusively governs. PODA s. 83(1) bail must be sought directly in the High Court. PTA matters involve extended detention powers.

    Bail Act ss. 7, 13, 14, 17CCPA ss. 37, 115, 120, 402PODA s. 83(1)PTA
    03

    Magistrate Court Proceedings

    Summary trials, non-summary inquiries, and committal

    On conclusion of the investigation, the Magistrate determines the future course of the matter. The route depends on whether the offence is triable summarily, requires a non-summary inquiry, or is indictable before the High Court.

    A
    No evidence — suspect discharged
    Magistrate discharges under CCPA s. 120(3); investigation does not proceed further
    B
    Summary trial — Magistrate Court alone
    Offence within 8th column of 1st Schedule (CCPA s. 10(b)) or punishable by imprisonment not exceeding 2 years or fine not exceeding Rs. 1,500 (s. 11(a)(ii)). Police generally prosecute. Appeal lies to High Court within 14 days (CCPA s. 320).
    C
    Non-summary inquiry / preliminary inquiry
    Required for serious offences (murder, attempted murder). Examines sufficiency of evidence for committal to High Court. If sufficient, transmitted to AG for consideration of .
    D
    Referred to Attorney General
    Indictable offences referred for AG's consideration. The AG may indict even where the Magistrate has discharged the suspect at the preliminary inquiry stage.
    CCPA ss. 10, 11, 145–159CCPA ss. 182–192 (Indictment)CCPA s. 320 (Appeal)Judicature Act No. 2 of 1978
    04

    High Court — & Pre-Trial

    Service of indictment, bail, jury election, and preparation

    Where a case is indicted in the High Court, the first date is for service of the indictment on the accused. The attorney must obtain and review it for defects. Bail conditions are then set by the High Court judge. All trials in the High Court are before a judge alone — unless the accused elects jury trial.

    Trial by judge alone

    All High Court trials shall be before a judge (Judicature Act, s. 11(1)). Verdict under CCPA s. 203. Sentencing under s. 203. Appeal under s. 235.

    Trial by jury (accused election)

    Accused may elect jury trial if the offence falls within the 2nd Schedule of the Judicature Act (CCPA, s. 161). Jury verdict under CCPA s. 234. Sentencing under s. 238.
    • Obtain and review indictment for accuracy, defects, and the specific charges alleged
    • Note bail conditions: cash bail, sureties (Grama Sevaka certificates, National Identity Cards), possible passport surrender
    • Comply with pre-trial conference requirements — CCPA (Amendment) Act No. 2 of 2022
    • Obtain all prosecution material: witness statements, medico-legal reports, analyst reports, audit reports, DNA reports
    • Advise accused on right to elect jury trial where offence falls within 2nd Schedule — decision must be made before commencement of trial
    • If computer-generated evidence is to be tendered, comply with Evidence (Special Provisions) Act No. 14 of 1995
    • Check fingerprint report for previous convictions before advising on any plea
    CCPA ss. 161, 167, 194, 201CCPA (Amendment) Act No. 2 of 2022Judicature Act s. 11Evidence (Special Provisions) Act No. 14 of 1995
    05

    Trial

    Prosecution case, defence case, and verdict — with defence frameworks

    The prosecution leads its case first; the defence responds. Standard of proof throughout: beyond reasonable doubt. The defence need not prove anything — the burden rests entirely on the prosecution.

    1
    Opening statements
    Prosecution opens its case. Defence may open before leading its own evidence (CCPA s. 184(3) / s. 221(1) for jury).
    2
    Prosecution case — direct evidence & cross-examination
    Prosecution witnesses examined in chief; defence cross-examines. After prosecution case closes, defence may apply for discharge under s. 200(1) CCPA if evidence is insufficient to require a defence.
    3
    Defence case
    Accused may: (a) remain silent; (b) make a dock statement (not subject to cross-examination); or (c) give sworn evidence from the witness box (subject to cross-examination). Defence witnesses may be called. Each option carries distinct tactical implications — advise carefully.
    4
    Closing arguments & verdict
    Final submissions; judge or jury delivers verdict. Not guilty → accused released. Guilty → proceed to sentencing.
    Available defences — select to explore
    CCPA ss. 152, 184, 199–203, 218–234Evidence OrdinancePenal Code
    06

    Sentencing &

    Submissions in mitigation and sentencing outcomes

    On conviction the court proceeds immediately to sentencing. The court retains full discretion. No assurance of outcome can be given to the accused. Counsel must be fully prepared with a comprehensive mitigation submission.

    Mitigating factors (address all applicable)

    Age and personal circumstances; absence of prior convictions; suspended sentence availability (CCPA s. 303); family and dependent circumstances; readiness to pay compensation to aggrieved party; plea of guilty at earliest opportunity; cooperation with investigation; humanitarian factors; mental health.

    Sentencing outcomes available

    Monetary compensation to aggrieved party; community service order; conditional discharge; suspended sentence (where no minimum mandatory); imprisonment; death penalty (where applicable — currently under moratorium). Always argue for the least restrictive outcome appropriate.
    !

    Previous convictions matter: Always check the fingerprint report before advising on a plea of guilty. Previous convictions affect the sentencing range and whether a suspended sentence is available under s. 303 of the CCPA.

    CCPA s. 303 (Suspended sentences)SC Ref. 3/2008 (Minimum mandatory)Prevention of Crimes OrdinanceAssistance to Victims of Crime Act No. 4 of 2015
    07

    Appeal &

    Challenging conviction, sentence, or Magistrate orders

    An accused has a right of appeal within prescribed time limits. Revision provides a discretionary remedy requiring exceptional circumstances — it is not a substitute for appeal.

    Magistrate Court → High Court (s. 320)

    Petition of appeal filed in Magistrate Court registry within 14 days of conviction. Attorney's certificate required where appeal is on a point of law. Bail pending appeal may be sought in the Magistrate Court.

    High Court → Court of Appeal (ss. 331–342)

    Petition filed in High Court registry within 14 days. Court of Appeal hears: appellant's submissions, then Attorney General, then oral arguments. Brief fees payable. Bail pending appeal sought in High Court.

    Court of Appeal → Supreme Court

    SC Special Leave to Appeal Application within 6 weeks of Court of Appeal order. Must demonstrate a substantial question of law or matter fit for Supreme Court review. Filed with petition, , and proxy.

    Revision — discretionary

    Exceptional circumstances must be demonstrated. Petition and affidavit with certified copy of full case record. No right of revision where appeal was available without explanation of failure to appeal.
    CCPA ss. 320, 331–342Constitution Arts. 128, 138Court of Appeal Rules 1990
    01

    Fundamental Rights Application

    Supreme Court — Constitution, Art. 126

    The Supreme Court has sole and exclusive jurisdiction to hear any question relating to the infringement or imminent infringement by executive or administrative action of any fundamental right under Chapter III or IV of the Constitution (Arts. 10–14), by virtue of Art. 17 read together with Art. 126.

    ?

    In plain terms: If a government officer, department, or state authority has done something to you that violates your constitutional rights — arrested you without cause, discriminated against you, censored you, or taken your property without authority — you can go directly to the Supreme Court. You have one month from the date of the violation to file. Act immediately.

    !

    Time limit: one month from the date of infringement. If a complaint has been lodged with the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka and the inquiry is pending, the application may be filed after the one-month period (HRCSL Act No. 21 of 1996, s. 13). Always advise the client to lodge an HRC complaint at the earliest opportunity.

    • Obtain written instructions and all supporting documents at the initial consultation
    • Identify all necessary party respondents — all persons against whom relief is sought must be named
    • Advise client to immediately lodge a complaint with the Human Rights Commission to preserve the right to file after one month
    • Petition and supporting — filed in the Supreme Court registry
    • Annexures: medical reports, gazettes, circulars, photographs, voice/video recordings, HRC complaint receipt

    Fundamental rights protected (Arts. 10–14)

    Freedom of thought; freedom from arbitrary arrest and detention; freedom of speech; right to equality; right against discrimination; language rights (Arts. 18–22). See Channa Pieris v. AG [1994] 1 SLR 1 on proportionality of restrictions.

    Restrictions (Arts. 15–16)

    Rights may be restricted only in limited circumstances (e.g. preservation of public security) and any restriction must be proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued. Disproportionate restrictions are unconstitutional.
    Constitution Arts. 10–16, 17, 126SC Rules 1990, Part IV, Rule 44HRCSL Act No. 21 of 1996, s. 13
    02

    Leave to Proceed

    Supporting the application before the Supreme Court

    Once filed, the matter is listed for the petitioner to support the application for leave to proceed. The petitioner must satisfy the court that there is a prima facie case of infringement or imminent infringement. If leave is refused, the matter ends — the same infringement cannot be re-agitated.

    1
    File petition and in SC registry
    Obtain a date to support in the leave to proceed list — serve copies on named respondents
    2
    Support — leave to proceed list
    Oral submissions establishing prima facie case of infringement. Counsel must be concise and focused on the constitutional right alleged to be violated and the executive or administrative action causing it.
    3A
    Leave granted
    Notices issued on all respondents; matter proceeds to objections, written submissions, and hearing
    3B
    Leave refused
    Matter concludes. The same infringement cannot be re-agitated in the Supreme Court. Alternative remedies (e.g. writ application in Court of Appeal) should be considered before filing if there is doubt about leave.
    Constitution Art. 126SC Rules 1990
    03

    Objections, Submissions & Hearing

    Exchange of affidavits and final oral arguments

    Where leave is granted, respondents are served with notice and given the opportunity to file objections. The matter then proceeds through written submissions and oral argument before the bench delivers judgment.

    1
    Notices issued on all respondents
    Notice returnable date fixed by the registry
    2
    Statement of objections / counter- by respondents
    Filed within 14 days of service of notice (SC Rules, Part IV)
    3
    Counter-affidavit by petitioner
    Filed within 14 days in reply to the allegations of fact contained in any respondent's affidavit
    4
    Written submissions & oral hearing
    Both parties file written submissions; oral arguments heard before the bench; judgment delivered
    SC Rules 1990, Part IV, Rule 44
    04

    Writ Applications

    Court of Appeal jurisdiction — Article 140 — select each writ to explore

    The Court of Appeal has full power and authority under Article 140 to issue orders in the nature of writs of certiorari, prohibition, procedendo, mandamus, and quo warranto. is governed by Article 141. Applications proceed by petition and affidavit in the Court of Appeal registry.

    Certiorari is available to quash a past exercise of power that was (a) invalid exercise of power — i.e. the body acted without or in excess of jurisdiction; or (b) valid exercise of power but containing an error of law on the face of the record. Unlike prohibition, certiorari addresses what has already happened. It is available against any inferior court, tribunal, or body exercising a public function. (Constitution, Art. 140; Court of Appeal (Appellate Procedure) Rules 1990.)

    Common elements across writ applications

    Petition; supporting ; proxy; notice on all respondents; motion. Once filed, petitioner supports and seeks notice on respondents. Thereafter: objections, counter-objections, written submissions, inquiry, and order.

    Relationship between FR and writ applications

    Both FR applications (Supreme Court) and writ applications (Court of Appeal) may be available in a given situation. The choice of forum depends on whether the remedy sought is FR vindication or administrative law review. Both may be pursued in appropriate cases, but consider leave prospects carefully before filing the FR application.
    Constitution Arts. 140, 141Court of Appeal (Appellate Procedure) Rules 1990
    01

    A Mixed Legal System

    Roman-Dutch law, English common law, and personal laws — Sri Lanka's unique legal pluralism
    ?

    In plain terms: Sri Lanka does not follow one single legal tradition. Over four centuries of colonisation and a rich pre-colonial history have produced a legal system that draws from multiple sources at once. Which law applies to you depends on who you are, where you live, and what the matter is about.

    Sri Lanka's legal system is the product of successive historical layers. Portuguese rule (1505–1658) left little legal imprint. Dutch rule (1658–1796) introduced Roman-Dutch lawThe legal system developed in the Netherlands from the 15th to 18th centuries, blending Roman law principles with Dutch customary law. It remains the residuary common law of Sri Lanka — applying where no statute or personal law governs. as the residuary common law. British rule (1796–1948) grafted English legal principles — judicial precedent, adversarial procedure, commercial law — onto this Dutch foundation. After independence in 1948, Sri Lanka enacted its own statutes but the underlying plural structure remained.

    Roman-Dutch law — residuary law

    Where no statute applies and no personal law governs, Roman-Dutch law is the default common law of Sri Lanka. As Justice Weeramanthry stated in The Costa v Bank of Ceylon: "Roman-Dutch Law was thus firmly enthroned as the Common Law of this Country." Its practical scope is now limited primarily to certain areas of private law.

    English law — dominant in practice

    Despite Roman-Dutch law being the formal residuary law, English common law principles have greater practical dominance — particularly in commercial law, evidence, procedure, and judicial precedent. Sri Lanka's adversarial court system, doctrine of stare decisisLatin: "to stand by things decided." The doctrine requiring courts to follow earlier decisions of courts of equal or higher authority. Binding precedent forms the core of case law development in Sri Lanka., and much of its statute law are English-derived.

    The 1978 Constitution — supreme law

    The Constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka (1978), as amended, is the supreme law of the Republic. No law may be inconsistent with it. Section 3 declares the sovereignty of the people — exercised through the executive, legislature, and judiciary. The Constitution has been amended 21 times. It protects fundamental rights (Chapter III), establishes the court structure (Chapter XV), and provides for an independent judiciary.
    1978 ConstitutionRoman-Dutch Law (residuary)Judicature Act No. 2 of 1978
    02

    Personal Laws

    Kandyan law, Thesawalamai, and Muslim law — laws that apply to specific communities
    ?

    In plain terms: Some Sri Lankans are governed by different laws on matters of family, marriage, and inheritance — depending on their ethnicity and where they live. These are not lesser laws — they are legally recognised systems with centuries of history, now regulated by specific statutes.

    Sri Lanka's personal law system recognises that different communities have distinct legal customs governing marriage, divorce, and inheritance. These personal laws apply concurrently with the general law on matters not governed by them. Selecting the correct applicable law is essential — it determines jurisdiction, procedure, and outcome in family matters.

    Select a personal law to explore

    Kandyan Law

    Kandyan law is a territorial law of the Kandyan kingdom, recognised and preserved under the Kandyan Convention of 1815. It applies to Kandyan Sinhalese inhabitants of the upcountry region and governs matters of marriage, divorce, and inheritance within that community.

    Key statute: The Kandyan Marriage and Divorce Act. Kandyan law is not applicable to persons who migrate from the lowlands to the upcountry — settled in William v Robertson (1886) 8 SCC 36. Recognises customary marriage forms — binna (wife's family home) and deega (husband's family home) — and distinct inheritance principles.

    Kandyan Marriage and Divorce ActMatrimonial Rights and Inheritance Ordinance 1911 (Thesawalamai)Muslim Marriage and Divorce Act No. 13 of 1951
    03

    Sources of Law

    How Sri Lankan law is made, interpreted, and applied
    ?

    In plain terms: Sri Lankan law comes from several places at once — not just from Parliament. A judgment of the Supreme Court is as much "the law" as an Act of Parliament. Understanding where law comes from explains why lawyers cite cases, why some disputes have no clear statutory answer, and why judges have discretion.

    Sri Lanka has a mixed and hierarchical system of legal sources. The Constitution sits at the apex. Below it, statutes enacted by Parliament govern most areas of law. Where statutes are silent, Roman-Dutch law applies as the residuary common law. English common law principles supplement this where established by courts. Judicial precedent — particularly decisions of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal — is binding on lower courts.

    1. The Constitution

    Supreme law of the Republic. Any law inconsistent with it is void to the extent of the inconsistency (Art. 120). Interpreted exclusively by the Supreme Court.

    2. Statutes (Acts of Parliament)

    Primary legislation enacted by Parliament. Govern most areas: civil and criminal procedure, companies, land, evidence, employment, tax, intellectual property.

    3. Subordinate legislation

    Regulations, rules, and orders made under statutory power. Published in the Gazette. Equally binding but may be challenged if ultra vires the parent Act.

    4. Judicial precedent

    Decisions of the Supreme Court bind all lower courts. Court of Appeal decisions bind High Courts and below. Decisions of equivalent courts are persuasive. Sri Lanka follows the doctrine of stare decisis.

    5. Roman-Dutch law

    Residuary common law — applies where statutes are silent and no personal law governs. Supplemented by English common law principles where courts have adopted them.

    6. Textual precedent & custom

    Established legal texts (Voet, van Leeuwen, Grotius) on Roman-Dutch law are cited as authority. Recognised customs of specific communities may also be applied where established.
    Constitution Art. 120Interpretation OrdinanceGazette of the DSSR
    04

    International Law in Sri Lanka

    Treaties, the ICCPR Act, and the status of international obligations
    ?

    In plain terms: Sri Lanka has signed international human rights treaties — but signing a treaty does not automatically make it part of Sri Lankan law. Parliament must pass a law to incorporate it. The most important example is the ICCPR Act, which makes certain international human rights enforceable in Sri Lankan courts.

    Sri Lanka is a dualistA dualist legal system requires Parliament to pass domestic legislation incorporating an international treaty before it has legal effect in domestic courts. Sri Lanka follows this approach — ratifying a treaty alone does not make it enforceable by Sri Lankan courts. state — international treaty obligations do not automatically form part of domestic law. They must be incorporated by an Act of Parliament. Sri Lanka is a signatory to key international instruments including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the Convention Against Torture (CAT), and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC).

    ICCPR Act No. 56 of 2007

    The most practically significant domestic incorporation of international human rights. Gives effect to rights under the ICCPR. Enforceable in the High Court — a person whose ICCPR rights are violated may apply to the High Court for relief under s. 4(2). Distinct from FR applications before the Supreme Court.

    Convention Against Torture Act No. 22 of 1994

    Criminalises torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment by any public officer. Creates a specific criminal offence with significant penalties. Any evidence obtained by torture is inadmissible. Complaints may be pursued domestically or before the UN CAT Committee.

    Right to Information Act No. 12 of 2016

    Gives every citizen the right to access information held by public authorities. Requests must be responded to within 14 days (extendable to 21 days). Refusals may be appealed to the Information Commission. A significant tool for holding public institutions accountable and for gathering evidence in administrative law and FR matters.
    ICCPR Act No. 56 of 2007CAT Act No. 22 of 1994Right to Information Act No. 12 of 2016
    01

    Mediation & Mandatory Pre-Trial Mediation

    Mediation Act No. 72 of 1988 — compulsory in many civil disputes before court
    ?

    In plain terms: Before you can file many types of civil cases in court, you must first attempt to resolve the dispute through government-run mediation. A neutral mediator tries to help both sides agree. If it works, the settlement is binding. If it fails, you get a certificate allowing you to proceed to court. Many disputes end here — quietly, cheaply, and without a public record.

    The Mediation Boards Act No. 72 of 1988 established a mandatory mediation process for a broad range of civil disputes. Mediation is not voluntary — for covered disputes, a party cannot institute court proceedings without first obtaining a certificate from the Mediation Board confirming that mediation failed or was not possible. The process is conducted before a panel of trained mediators appointed by the Mediation Boards Commission.

    Matters requiring prior mediation

    Civil disputes where the claim does not exceed Rs. 500,000 (subject to gazette); land disputes; disputes between neighbours; recovery of movable property; disputes involving personal injury. Courts will not accept filings in covered matters without the Board's certificate.

    The mediation process

    Application filed at the local Mediation Board. Both parties summoned to appear before mediators. Sessions are informal and confidential. If settlement is reached, it is recorded and certified — enforceable as a . If mediation fails within 3 months, certificate issued to proceed to court.
    !

    Limitation periods continue to run during mediation. Filing at the Mediation Board does not stop the Ordinance from running. If a matter is close to being time-barred, seek advice on whether to file in court simultaneously or apply to the Board urgently.

    Mediation Boards Act No. 72 of 1988Mediation Boards Commission
    02

    Labour Tribunal

    Industrial Disputes Act No. 43 of 1950 — primary forum for employment disputes
    ?

    In plain terms: If you've been dismissed from your job, had your wages unlawfully withheld, or face a workplace grievance, the Labour Tribunal is usually the first place to go — not the District Court. It is faster, less formal, and specifically designed for employment disputes. Both employer and employee can appear.

    Labour Tribunals are established under the Industrial Disputes Act No. 43 of 1950. They have jurisdiction over disputes between employers and workmen arising from employment or termination of employment. The Tribunal can order reinstatement, backwages, or compensation in lieu of reinstatement. Labour Tribunal proceedings are relatively informal — parties may appear without legal representation, though representation is permitted.

    Jurisdiction

    Employment disputes, unlawful termination, constructive dismissal, wage disputes, and disputes arising from collective agreements. Does not cover managerial employees in certain categories — check the applicability of the Act for senior employees.

    Remedies available

    Reinstatement with or without backwages; compensation in lieu of reinstatement; orders for payment of wages. Tribunal orders are enforceable through the District Court.

    Conciliation before Tribunal

    Before a matter proceeds to a full Tribunal hearing, the Commissioner of Labour may attempt conciliation between the parties. If conciliation succeeds, the settlement is binding. This is a parallel process to mediation and is specific to industrial disputes. Many employment matters are resolved at this stage without reaching the Tribunal.
    Industrial Disputes Act No. 43 of 1950Shop and Office Employees ActTermination of Employment Act No. 45 of 1971
    03

    Arbitration

    Arbitration Act No. 11 of 1995 — private, binding dispute resolution
    ?

    In plain terms: Arbitration is a private alternative to going to court. Both parties agree — usually in advance through a clause in a contract — to have their dispute decided by a neutral arbitrator instead of a judge. The decision is binding and enforceable as a court order. It is particularly common in commercial and construction contracts.

    The Arbitration Act No. 11 of 1995 governs arbitration in Sri Lanka and is modelled substantially on the UNCITRAL Model Law. Where parties to a contract have included an arbitration clauseA contractual term requiring disputes between the parties to be resolved through arbitration rather than litigation. Courts have no jurisdiction to hear a dispute covered by a valid arbitration clause if one party objects (Arbitration Act, s. 5)., the courts have no jurisdiction to hear that dispute if one party invokes the clause. The clause operates as a complete bar to litigation on that matter.

    When arbitration applies

    Where the parties have agreed in writing to arbitrate disputes arising from their contract. The agreement must be in writing. Courts will stay proceedings and refer parties to arbitration where a valid agreement exists and a party objects to court jurisdiction (s. 5).

    The arbitral award

    A final arbitral award is binding on the parties. It may be enforced through the High Court as a court order. Awards may only be challenged on narrow grounds specified in the Act (procedural irregularity, excess of jurisdiction, public policy). Challenges on the merits of the award are not permitted.

    ICDRC — International Dispute Resolution

    The International Commercial Dispute Resolution Centre (ICDRC), established under the Port City Colombo Act No. 11 of 2021, provides institutional arbitration for international commercial disputes connected to Port City. Parties may also elect the SLAAD (Sri Lanka Association for International Arbitration and Dispute Resolution) or international institutions such as the SIAC, LCIA, or ICC.
    Arbitration Act No. 11 of 1995UNCITRAL Model LawPort City Colombo Act No. 11 of 2021
    04

    Primary Courts & Small Claims

    Primary Court Procedure Act No. 44 of 1979
    ?

    In plain terms: Primary Courts handle small civil claims and minor criminal matters. If you have a minor dispute about money, nuisance, or damage that does not justify the cost of a District Court action, a Primary Court may be the appropriate forum. The process is simpler and less expensive.

    Primary Courts, established under the Primary Court Procedure Act No. 44 of 1979, exercise jurisdiction over minor civil and criminal matters. They provide a more accessible forum for disputes of limited financial or factual complexity. Procedure before Primary Courts is less formal than District Courts, making them more accessible to litigants without legal representation.

    Primary Court — civil
    Primary Court Procedure Act No. 44 of 1979
    Small civil claims; recovery of movable property; enforcement of certain statutory obligations. The monetary limit and subject matter jurisdiction is defined by the Act and relevant gazette notifications.
    Primary Court — criminal
    CCPA; Primary Court Procedure Act
    Minor criminal matters and regulatory offences. Presided over by a Magistrate. Less formal procedure than the Magistrate Court for more serious criminal matters.
    Rent Board / Rent Tribunal
    Rent Act No. 7 of 1972
    Disputes between landlords and tenants over controlled premises — rent increases, eviction, unlawful recovery of possession. Specialised forum with its own procedure.
    Consumer Affairs Authority
    Consumer Affairs Authority Act No. 9 of 2003
    Complaints about unfair trade practices, defective goods, and consumer protection matters. The CAA investigates and may impose fines or issue directions. Separate from court proceedings but decisions may be enforced.
    Primary Court Procedure Act No. 44 of 1979Rent Act No. 7 of 1972Consumer Affairs Authority Act No. 9 of 2003
    Rights of the Accused — Quick Reference Constitution · CCPA · ICCPR
    Right to mount a defence
    CCPA s. 260 · Constitution Art. 13(3)
    Presumption of innocence
    Constitution Art. 13(5) · ICCPR Art. 14(2)
    Freedom from torture
    Constitution Art. 11 · CAT · ICCPR Art. 7
    Right to remain silent
    CCPA s. 111 · Constitution Art. 13(5)
    Right to legal representation
    Constitution Art. 13(3) · CCPA s. 260 · Legal Aid Commission Act
    Right to due process
    Constitution Arts. 12–13 · ICCPR Art. 14
    Right to equal protection
    Constitution Art. 12 · ICCPR Art. 26
    Right against double jeopardy
    CCPA s. 314 · ICCPR Art. 14(7)
    Right to be informed of charges
    Constitution Art. 13(1) · CCPA ss. 23(1), 146
    Right to bail (where applicable)
    CCPA s. 402 · Bail Act No. 30 of 1997
    Language interpretation
    Constitution Art. 24 · CCPA ss. 275, 277
    Right against unlawful searches
    Constitution Art. 13 · CCPA ss. 76–100

    Content last reviewed against the statutes and rules cited below.

    This guide provides general procedural reference only and does not constitute legal advice. Statutory provisions, court practice, and case law are subject to change. Sources: BASL Induction Handbook for Junior Lawyers (USAID/EEJ, 2022); IBJ Sri Lanka Criminal Defence Practice Manual (IBJ, 2020); Civil Procedure Code; Code of Criminal Procedure Act; Constitution of Sri Lanka. For guidance on a specific matter before a Sri Lankan court, qualified legal advice should be obtained.